Monthly Archives: July 2007

Nineteen Years

Last night, my mom  reminded me…nineteen years ago today, my father died.

My sister called me that afternoon (or was it morning), a call that was not unexpected, seeing as how I’d said my good-byes to him a couple of weeks earlier.  Jimmy Joe Berryman (1934-1988) suffered from leukemia, and I’d been called to Texas earlier because doctors believed his death to be immanent.  But as if often the case, he rallied, and I had to go home, back to Seattle.

Amy, my first child, was born one month and three days later.

Now Amy is almost nineteen, home from her first year in college, and my son Daniel is a senior in high school.  One of my most vivid dreams is to someday introduce my children to my father.   It is an emotional image, obviously, as I stand cross-like stretching my hands to past and present, to father and child, trying to link my histories, my loves, my partners in being in the world.

He was a good man, my father.  He rose out of a fatherless childhood, his own dad having apparently abandoned him and his mother, and so he came to his relationship with me with little understanding of what father-son was about.  Nonetheless, as my sister said last night as we talked, he went to the Bible and studied hard, pursuing as best he knew how a relationship with God, and by extension, trying to figure out how to live.  He discovered a lot, made tons of progress, enough to merit my uncle’s observation upon his death.  “He was the best man I ever knew.”

Nineteen years later, I think maybe that’s a bit romantic–I’m not sure he was the best man I’ve ever known.  (I’m sure I won’t be the best Amy and Daniel come across) but Dad was a man of, and in pursuit of, God.   Not perfect, perhaps a bit misguided theologically (he and I certainly wouldn’t agree on things God-related), and he died musing over why we talk so long of heaven, and then when the end comes, work so hard to avoid the trip.  I have his journals from his last days, and to read them is to see a man of faith struggling to let that faith have its say in the face of death.

It was unexpected, Dad’s journeying with me during the days of performing Leaving Ruin.  In manner and gesture and gait, it’s him up there as I traipse around the stage, and in my imagination, and perhaps more, he watches me, comes to me in very particular moments of the play, and I think he’s probably as he always was.  Bemused by his son, not understanding at all, but oddly tolerant, and perhaps even, on occasion, glad I was following the paths that called to me.

When I said good-bye, after a tearful prayer around the hospital bed–”Take care of your family, son”–I walked out into a world in which my father would no longer be there.  It was a crushing sensation, a lonely thing, and I remember stopping as I exited the hospital, and bending at the waist, the sheer weight of walking alone, walking without him, pressing me into the earth.  My sister Jody stood with her hand on my back as I tried to grasp the passage I was locked in, tried to comprehend that I could, I would, I must, move forward with hammer-heavy pain.

I look around the world today, and know that God is watching and participating in hundreds of thousands of such passages today, and every day.  Each one precious, each journey devastating to someone, each one speaking to the essential mystery of life and being.

Someday, he and I will talk of it all, and know each other as we never did on this side.  That, too, is a mystery.  But it is my faith.

Nineteen years into your forever, Dad…Godspeed… 

1 Comment

Filed under Daily Life

Ponette

The house was quiet, the work of the week was done, and Sabbath lay just ahead.  After days of beautiful, hot weather, outdoors turned blustery, rain occasionally beating on the south-facing window of my office.  I wandered downstairs, wondering when I might get started on a much needed work-out regimen to get a little extra poundage off.   Made a cup of coffee, trundled down the stairs and threw in a DVD I’ve been meaning to watch for years.

House lights to half, cue sound and let’s watch this thing.

Ponette.

For those of you who know this 1996 film that won a best actor award at the Venice Film Festival for the four-year-old star, you know something of what I’m feeling just now.  The film finished about a half-hour ago, and I am still all a-twitter, aglow, a-tremble…I have no idea what word to use.

First of all, Victoire Thivisol (also of Chocolat fame).  Miraculous…what else is there to say?  She was  four-years-old at the time and nothing short of luminous.  From a cognitive point of view, there is no way she is processing intellectually what she is doing as an actor (duh), and the emotional nuance needed to pull this off is so massive as to defy description.  The story is simple: a small French girl loses her mother in a car accident and spends the rest of the film grieving and searching for her.  She seeks the help of God through prayer, endures trials set before her by a Jewish friend who knows the path to becoming a child of God (who knew you had to leap from a fence for such distinction?), and withstands the playground nincompoop who tells her it was her fault her mother died.  The father’s not much help…he tells her she’s crazy for thinking she will ever see her mother again and that “God is for the dead, not for us.” Then he leaves her with relatives while he goes off to work for what seems like weeks at a time.

I just read an interesting article in Salon on Ponette and the question it raises about a child actor’s performance, and it echoes something I actually thought about several times during the course of the film–the great respect Jacques Doillon had for his cast and the subject with which he was dealing.  The air of the film is so unassuming and intimate that it is easy to forget what a huge risk Doillon is taking in walking this deeply into a child’s perspective.   Laura Miller, writer of the Salon article, gives us some interesting insight into the making of the film.

I’d love to spoil it for you, but I won’t.  Let’s just say that “unless you have the faith of a child” kept resonating through my head.   Oh, what a gift this film was tonight. As I put the dishes away in the blustery quiet afterwards, I just kept laughing, out loud, and even shouted a couple of “Thank You’s!”

…who knows, maybe I’ll even go learn to be happy… 

1 Comment

Filed under Film and Television

The Subtle Knife

I didn’t laugh as much as I plowed through this one.

I mentioned that I laughed a bit during The Golden Compass because it was so obvious what Philip Pullman was up to according to quantum physics and the  psychology of Jung, James Hillman and Thomas Moore.  In The Subtle Knife, Pullman gains steam and begins to gather the forces of good from multiple parallel worlds to take on his equivalent of Tolkein’s Sauron, the Dark Lord.

In a fairly large casting foh-pah, Pullman has asked God to fill the role.

There is a critique of Christianity in these books that bears thinking about.  The bottom line is that Pullman (and others of this ilk) believes that Christianity destroys life.   All the various metaphors Pullman employs as he moves from world to world are metaphors of life being cut away from people by various ill forces, all of which are run by people with dark, hard hearts who pledge allegiance to “the Almighty.”  He makes his case is stark, violent, and jarring terms.   As a mere reader of fantasy, I am absolutely rooting for Pullman’s heroes to succeed in their quest, for the enemy in these multiple worlds is absolutely Satanic, if you follow Pullman’s logic.

Of course, Pullman’s logic leaves a bit to be desired.

At issue is the meaning of life.  What is life?  Human life.  Where is life to be found?  There is agreement, I think, in the idea that human beings should act according to their essential nature, and that violence is done when they move away from it.  The acorn, to fully live, must become an oak.   Period.  In Pullman’s world, Christianity, and by implication, all monotheistic religion, forces acorns to become grotesque weeds.   Where we part company is in what we believe the essential nature of the human to be.

We believe God made human beings, and life, according to His Image.  For Pullman, the Image of God is a straightjacket, one that cuts us off from connection with the real, with the physical, with the sensual, with the instinctual, with the truth.  At issue are all the central understandings of the human–what is good, what is love, what is sin, what is wrong with things, what actions will bring the greater good.

Pullman is no atheist, whatever he claims.  His is a divinely driven world, the divine simply being Consciousness (often capitalized in atheistic literature) or in the case of this fiction, Dust.  Always, always, there is a force moving in the universe other than humans (true in Richard Dawkins as well) a force that exerts energy that humans are asked to tap into.  People go into trances, they calm their spirits, they meditate–they do something to tap into this greater thing–why not call it god–in order to align themselves more closely with it, such alignment being of course, good.

Anyway, here’s my question, the heart of Pullman’s critique of Christianity.  What is life?  I know Jesus said, I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.   So, he’s the life.  Okay.  But what is life?   How do you know when you’re living it?  Is Pullman’s essential point of view that we are cut off from experiencing life a fair one? Why or why not?

As you mull the question, don’t answer to defend Christianity.  Don’t answer to win the point.  Don’t answer to sound intelligent on a blog.  Pullman and company are using the tools of popular culture to hammer away at the foundations of faith in God and in this particular vision of life.

Experientially, how do you answer?

2 Comments

Filed under Books, Faith and Art

Sabbath Practice

I’ve been selling people on this idea of Sabbath, lately, having just experienced yet another day of stoppage from the rat race. Last night, a friend of mine asked me what I was did on Sabbath, what the experience looked like. Truth to tell, I’m just feeling my way along based on a couple of biblical ideas, but so far, at least from a re-creative point of view, I seem to be on the right track.

The first thing is to stop. It’s hard to explain just how hard this has been over the years. My mind has been a churn machine, turning over endless ideas about God, human beings, epistemology, family,story, story-writing techniques, moral dilemmas, sex, schedules, ought-to’s and shouldn’ts, plans and dreams…the list of the churned goes on and on. Perhaps that’s what thought-life is, churning. But when pleasure reading become just another exercise in analysis, when music fails to delight, when films and plays become temptations in despair because I didn’t write it or make it or produce anything near that quality, churning has a much different quality than contemplation. Chasing the ever-elusive gold ring of (fill-in-the-blank here, whatever you’re chasing) becomes a job wherein there is literally no time to lose, every minute slipping by a move closer to the moment when no more moments are coming, all chances on this side of the curtain lost.

So stop. Just stop. For three Saturdays in a row, I have stopped. Maybe things will change over time (I’m sure they will), but just now it is a dip in a cool, cool pond on an over-one-hundred degree day. It is a black dust storm miraculously vanishing to reveal a crystal green valley and shimmering morning sky. It is a churning machine taken apart and put to quiet sleep. It is silence, and sight, and hearing. It is–just as it should be, as those well-practiced in Sabbath put it–rest.

On Saturday, probably the most memorable piece of the day was as I contemplated what God did on His Sabbath. Here I’m fudging a bit, inventing, or at least reading what’s implied, but I imagine God looking over his creation, satisfied, taking delight in what He had made, not in a prideful manner, but in a manner that simply takes in that which is good and calls it that, and lets that delight resonate in His Being, His Being being that which allows for and originates delight in the first place.

So I rested from all that I had done, and looked back and took delight in all that I had made. That sounds odd–slightly ridiculous, actually–but what an exerise. Just walking quietly through the years, looking at that single desire of my heart, to make stuff. The silly poems of junior high, the first songs I wrote in high school, the shows from the years at Abilene Christian University and a little summer thing we called Summerstage, the roles I played as a fledgling actor, the years of directing at UT Austin (my thesis show, The Shoemaker’s Holiday, an absolute joy to watch and direct, and the craziness of the mad rehearsal techniques I employed trying to get actors to celebrate the sheer joy of life), the fear and trembling I took to the Old Globe and the Seattle Rep, then the years of wandering, writing for hours in journals trying to grasp why the faith I’d been raised in was under siege, then the work at ACU again, this time as a teacher and critic, trying to help remake a program into a place that would send thoughtful Christian creatives (as Dick Staub would say) into the world of theatre. Then back to Seattle and all that’s happened since–the plays, the book, the roles at Taproot, the teaching, the blogging, the projects underway even now, the relationship with Willow Creek, the great blessing of so many friends I’ve sat with over coffee talking about the life with God that stirs me, the two glorious surprises that are my children and their ongoing work as makers of beautiful stuff. The love Anjie and I share.

Don’t misunderstand–I’m not taking full credit here, as if I am by-fiat creator of these things. But as God’s hand moved and made the world, God has given us all the great gift of touching the world, of making, choosing, creating, and impacting. There is delight in the “wake” (Dr. Henry Cloud) of my attempts at making beauty of various kinds, and it seems worthwhile to stop and remember that, to touch that, to let that sink in to a place where it can provide balance to the oft-churning thought that I am not nearly as successful as I should have been and should be, and that the beauty I so long for is so missing in the work done thus far.

And what does that contemplation leave me with? Thankfulness. Sheer delight not in my own work or my own anything, except my own God. The God that has been in every moment of every day, and Who will complete the work in me that He’s begun. Easier breathing, greater confidence in Him to do what He’s going to do, a clearer mind with which to make more.

Now it’s Monday morning, work about to commence. Somehow, the noise of former churning is calmer, more quiet. Something tells me Beauty may be easier to find, to hear, to chase after.

We’ll see.

…so grateful…

2 Comments

Filed under Faith and Art, Spirituality

The Golden Compass

When Amy and I went to see Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix last week, there as a very cool trailer for a movie coming out in December called The Golden Compass. Based on a book by Philip Pullman, this is a story that has been on the edges of my radar for several years due to the comments of my friend Jeffrey Overstreet. All I remember him saying was that we Christians were being typically dense by fighting over Harry Potter’s world when the real danger was to be found in Pullman’s trilogy, beginning with The Golden Compass, a trilogy referred to in total as His Dark Materials.

So between Wednesday and Saturday, I read The Golden Compass.

I also recently read The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins, as well as took another gander at What the Bleep? Down the Rabbit Hole, that funky little film about quantum physics alternately fascinating and slightly ridiculous, depending on who is being interviewed at the time. And then two other books: 101 Things You Don’t Know About Science and No One Else Does Either, by James Trefil, and God and the New Physics, by Paul Davies. Inadvertently, I was prepared for Mr. Pullman.

Which is why I kept laughing all the way through it. But don’t get me wrong, I didn’t laugh because it was ludicrous or offensive. I laughed because regardless of how my cosmology differs from Pullman’s, my hat is definitely off to him. Pretty cool stuff, and so, so blatant.

Imagine atheism as religious faith with Science being the Word of…well, who? Anyway, think of quantum physics as the revelation text somewhat analogous to the gospels. Maybe Newton is the Old Testament, and in quantum physics, the savior has arrived. Maybe there’s an epistle in there touting a “soulful” popular psychology, writings echoing perhaps (I’m not terribly well read in psychology) a couple of guys popular in the 90′s–Thomas Moore (Care of the Soul, Soulmates), James Hillman (The Blue Fire) or Sam Keen (Fire in the Belly). Now imagine that you want to get the story of no-god out there in order to save the world from the idiocy of the various theisms afflicting (like diseases) poor nuts like us Christians.

Hmmm, says Pullman. What was the best book of the 20th Century? Lord of the Rings. And there’s that whole Narnia thing, all that Christian allegory business. Hmmm….

What if I were to write a rip-roaring tale of adventure in a fantasy world built on the gospel of quantum physics? What if I could create a mythic structure to penetrate, to slip past their rational barriers (well, I don’t think he’d use the term rational–I don’t think atheists like Pullman think religious people have much rationality about them), to seize their imaginations, positing a world of glory and redemption that is simply different, more truthful than the obviously barbaric thing they currently enjoy. And the children, oh yes, the children. Let’s target the kids by putting the excruciating journey of growing up at the center of the tale (so beautifully done), get the quantum story into their imaginations, and by doing so, we’ll rescue them from the religious Gobblers who cut their souls from them every damn day. They shall know the truth, and the truth shall set them free.

Great, great, great, from his point of view, and tough, tough, tough to pull off.

But…make no mistake, he’s done it.

Let me be honest about my point of view. I’m pretty fascinated by the whole particle-wave thing, potentialities, entanglement, the mind-body problem and all that. Quantum physics is pretty mysterious, from what I can gather. What is reality, what is a human being, who is God–all these questions are compelling, and faith in Christ does not preclude me reflecting deeply on the nature of the scientific conversation (what I can grasp of it) and its relationship to the revelation of God through Jesus and the Bible. I suppose I’m of the school that says all truth belongs to God, and it’s truth we’re after. It’s Truth He wants us to be chasing, because it is His.

I’ll take on Pullman more fully after I’ve made it through the next two books. But here’s my major curiosity: Pullman’s world so far is a pretty straightforward place, if not a little crowded. (Do daimons take up any room?) It’s a moral world, for sure–compassion, love, justice. (He even capitalizes Dust (great, just great), and as usual, the universe has a will and pushes things almost like a god–hmmmm….) As I say that, I want to go back and read more carefully, because I think there are some attempts to hold on to “morality” while cutting the legs out from under it at the same time.

Anyway, read the trilogy, watch the film, but don’t go in eyes closed. This man hates the church, says it openly, and in this book and the ones to follow, we are the bad guys.

…bears in armor, O boy…

5 Comments

Filed under Books