Monthly Archives: August 2011

Jump Starting the Words Again…

Okay.   Just so you know, the few of you that come around and poke your awareness into my world, I have to begin just putting words down again.  No structure.  No editing. Just words.   I’ve come to a bit of a frozen place, and I have to break out of it, so here come the words.

It’s a writing exercise.  Sort of like the prompt to just write what comes to mind, no editing or thinking.  For you practical people out there, call it move #1 when you’re stuck.

Churning.  That’s what’s going on with me these days…churning.  There are facts, and there are stories about facts.  We are all different.  We are all the same. Lots of Jungian analysis reading lately, trying to grasp certain possibilities about character.  I’m an INFP, and yesterday wished I wasn’t.   Political conversation is everywhere, and by that, I mean conversations that mostly have to do with power brokering rather than discovering.  Who really knows what it will take to create jobs, lessen the number of folks on the public dole, and generally do the best thing for human beings around the world?   Lots of folks with answers, hunkering down, planting their feet, reading themselves to voice their best shots, whatever they’ve got, at the encroaching challenges.   A sort of panic sets in when what you believe comes under assault in what seems to be reasonable form, and you scramble to get your defenses into place.  But turns out, because of intelligence, or emotional unintelligence, or something else that’s unknown, all your defenses don’t amount to much, and you find yourself actually considering alternative ways of seeing things.  Unless of course, you’re entrenched, which, as Ulysses S. Grant says, leads to stalemate and heavy casualities.

I bought an Ipad not too long ago, and have been a bit transfixed by the wonder of the world as it flits across this screen, delivered by Flipboard in a magazine format that goes on forever.   News about a friend’s dog sits alongside pictures of famine and Libya and the church auditorium.  Art and design, classic songs by the greatest of artists, news both broad and deep depending on what you want to follow.    Brilliant photography that makes you feel like everyone on the planet has a camera and is on a hunt for amazing “captures.”   The imagining of films and poems and economics…oh, yes, economics too is imagination, the stock market swinging up and down depending on the guesses happening that day. Panic and bubble-born hope sends swaths of cash careening back and forth between the few wealthy folks who can afford to play that particular game, while the poor folk sit in the stands with old popcorn, disinterested, disheartened, and not quiet sure of the rules of the game they’re watching.

Yesterday, after a worship time of children’s songs (My God is a great big God..wider than the Universe…I kept leaning over to my physicist friend saying, “The universe is REALLY WIDE”), I fought with God through the afternoon in a full-throated, foul mouthed kind of way, and by the end of the evening, He and I were, as is often the case after a big fight, sitting and talking quietly, Him trying to not roll His eyes at my litany of complaint, me wishing I could hide the eye-rolling I’d been doing at His complete disinterest in making anything clear.   Certainly He has way bigger fish to fry than my petty need to have Him explain (yet again) the human condition to me.    As the night rolled on, I munched and sipped, went to the store, came back home and tried to read, but instead watched a bit of YouTube.  I watched Judi Dench do a speech from Twelfth Night, then compared her “Send in the Clowns” to Streisand’s (sorry, Barbara–Judi’s got you on this one), and watched Dame Dench receive a lifetime achievement award.   I listened to Streisand sing (again), then watched Patrick Stewart doing Shakespeare back in the 80′s, and saw a better version of that amazing entrance from Le Theatre du Soleil’s Richard II.   I thought about the whole chase after beauty for awhile, as well as the stalled nature of the play I’m working on, and pondered embracing futility as a way of being.   Having almost immediately rejected that, I spoke to my wife on the phone (she’s in Nashville) and apologized for my less-than-stellar-attitude of recent days, to which she winningly replied she hadn’t noticed.   I wished her goodnight, drank coffee until 1:00 a.m and then promptly went to sleep, only to wake up at 4:45 a.m. feeling amazingly refreshed.  I headed for the gym, changed up my routine, and came back home to fresh breezes blowing through the house.   I ate my little breakfast, read updates about my brilliant friend Julie who moved to Waco, and then came to the computer to find some words to write down.

I guess I found them.

Now headed south in my imagination, heading for that little house I call “Arlington” where Lee and Grant are still slugging it out after all these years.  Today, I’m working character, eating foods that supposedly keep my brain sharp, and will have carpet in the basement before the end of the day.

I like texture, density, and saying stuff…

There you go…

 

3 Comments

Filed under Daily Life, Pop Culture, Spirituality

You as Parable

If folks a thousand years from now preach sermons on your life, what would they walk away with…

Those are the opening lyrics to a song I wrote several years ago.  My reading yesterday in IMAGE journal reminded me of it by way of an interview with Walter Brueggemann, professor emeritus of Old Testament studies at Columbia.   Brueggemann’s work came to my attention through a couple of books on “The Prophetic Imagination”, and his early comments in the interview I was reading dealt with imagination as it relates to biblical faith.  He cites the work of Paul Ricoeur as being “seminal” in his thinking, especially as it related to Ricoeur’s comments on the parables of Christ.   In looking up Ricoeur’s work, I came across a great little (I say little, it’s pretty long and dense) work by a woman named Sallie McFague, an “American Feminist Christian Theologian”, according to Wikipedia.   Apparently McFague is all about metaphor–”theology is mostly fiction”–which, needless to say, appeals to me.

In the article I was perusing, written in 1975, she quotes Ricoeur as arguing that the forms of the “discourse” of Jesus is just as important as the content, and that the intentional use of parable is to be taken seriously, that Jesus was up to something not only because of what he thought, but because of who he was.    Then she asserts an arresting idea:  Jesus didn’t just speak in parables–Jesus was a parable.

The parables Jesus told, according to McFague, were not ideas to be pondered, but events demanding response.   She suggests that Jesus life did not announce the kingdom of God–it was the Kingdom of God.

Immediately, I thought of our lives as parables, which brings me back to the lyric at the top of this post.   What parable are you living out?  In what way does our life in the everyday living call forth a response from those who encounter our story?   And by encounter I don’t mean encounter the “telling of the story”, but the “living of the story.”  The “living word” is a call to a theatre of action and metaphor and presence, and now I’m back in the realm where I belong.

Metaphor, action, theatre, parable, Christ, art, and imagination.

Pay attention to the parable you’re living….

Leave a Comment

Filed under Daily Life, Faith and Art, Ideas, Spirituality, Writing

In the Questions

As I was working out this morning, I had to smile because the word I was living in the middle of wasn’t the word I thought I was in the middle of.  What I mean is this:  About two years ago, in a quiet session of writing and prayer, six words came to me…no seven, and the first of those words was “possibility.”  I’ve been reflecting on that word for awhile now, and I knew that the second word, “questions” was coming at some point, though I hadn’t really thought about it being quite yet.

But I am definitely in the period of questions.

Even as I start to type, I hesitate.   Isn’t a guy like me, fifty-two years old, having thought and thought and though my whole life, a teacher of the Bible in both formal and informal settings, a man whose life has been lived under the wing of Christ and his Church for almost forty years, supposed to be over his questions by now?  Obviously, if you know me, you know that’s not going to be the case.  But sometimes, admittedly, I wish the questions would leave me alone, so I could whistle along the path certain of what I believe like most folks.   But what does God want from us along these lines?  Obedience, sure.  Faith, sure.  Love, to be very sure.

So given that, then what?  The study of the Bible, sure.  But now we come to the questions.  As we encounter language, ancient language, translated language, meditated by streams of thinkers East and West over thousands of years, we have no choice but to make sense of what we hear, see, and experience.  ”Interpret” is the word that comes to mind; in postmodern parlance, we “tell stories.”  I grew up being told there was only one correct answer to Biblical interpretation on any given question.  I have counseled adults who are genuinely grieving over what I consider to be small matters, and I honor their grief, their passion for what they value, but my story and my reading and my experience leads me to passion over different matters, matters many no doubt consider trivial.  Fair enough.   But these days, my faith journey requires that I pick up my cross and carry it, and the questions are carved into that cross.

But before the questions, there are the things I bank on.  God is love.  His concern for, compassion for, knowledge of, and respect for his creation must exceed my love for my children by the nth power, but I don’t believe it is so “other” that His love for us looks radically, unrecognizably different.  What is love?  Working for the good of the other, in adoration, in respect, in joy, in obedience, because somehow, they are worthy of nothing less.  Thomas Merton articulated that for me years ago, and it remains my understanding.   God is also holy.   This is a harder thing to grasp.   To be holy is truly “other”, and here there is great room for error.   The great Shema declares that God is One, but often holiness and love are pitched against each other.  To encounter the holiness of God is to be judged sinner and damned.  (Think Isaiah 6, when Isaiah realizes his a man of unclean lips.  Enter the presence of God, I once said, and your unholiness will be revealed.)  To encounter the love of God is be given mercy and saved.   (Think Isaiah 6 again, and the angel with the live coal that somehow freely atones for the sin Isaiah was worried about.)

Holiness and love.  The character of God.  And there’s more to bank on, things I am fairly certain of.  I say it that way because its part of my faith that I need to keep a certain humility going about what I’m sure of.   It keeps me from being offensive off the top.  (I know some don’t care about that.  ”Be offensive.  Jesus was offensive!”)  Yeah, well…there’s a time and a place for everything, but in the beginning of conversations with strangers and readers, I’m pretty sure being offensive is a conversation-stopper.   Anyway, enough about the “meta-conversation”…More to bank on, that’s right.   The love of Christ, the centrality of the cross to human experience, the reality of the resurrection.   But even as I type those words, the questions are like pinballs inside me.

Truth is, I’m not a terribly orthodox sort of believer.   I am not a narrower.   You should see my mind-maps.   I keep mapping out the information streaming in at us through the various branches of knowledge, thinking over the implications of brain studies, psychology (including the fairly new discipline of “positive psychology”–thriving…), philosophy (what’s after postmodernism), social sciences and politics (why are the poor poor, and once they’re not poor, what do they do then? How best does a country create energy, opportunity, and safety-nets?), and the list could go on and on.  Technology, globalization, race relations, women’s issues, sexual issues…yes, there are principles to live by, and the wisdom of the ages gives us these…but still, so many questions….

I wonder how many of us are sitting in the pews these days wondering what I’m wondering…I haven’t read Rob Bell’s book Love Wins yet, but I watched the trailer he made to promote the book, and I know he’s at least wondering some of the same things.  Destiny is one of the big ones…

Back to the play…emphasis on the word “play”…

2 Comments

Filed under Faith and Art, Spirituality

Be Jeff

Over at The Happiness Project, Gretchen Rubin has a list of personal commandments, the first of which is “Be Gretchen.”  If you read the “Be Gretchen” post, you discover something rare: someone reflecting on the sadness of what it means to be yourself.   To be your “self” means to choose to not be (and do) lots of other things.  Once you know who you are, there are things that your life just doesn’t have space for anymore.   And it all makes sense because of your “mission.”

Writers and books have always had a major influence on the way I think about things.  Francis Schaeffer, Dallas Willard, Frederick Buechner, Thomas Merton, Barbara Brown Taylor, and Czeslaw Milosz, to name some of the major ones.  I was reading again through Merton’s Seeds of Contemplation this morning, and I came across this:

“Many poets are not poets for the same reason that many religious men are not saints: they never succeed in being themselves.   They never get around to being the particular poet or the particular monk they are intended to be by God.  They never become the man or the artist who is called for by all the circumstances of their individual lives.  They waste their years in vain efforts to be some other poet, some other saint.”  One of the major themes of Seeds is that God is the one who holds our true identity, so there is an interesting relationship between hunting for God and hunting for your truest self, the one that is not illusion and selfishness.

These thoughts come into play this week as I take yet another shot at this play I’m writing.   My current process of writing is as much about finding my work as it is about the final piece that emerges.  But my intuition tells me I’m missing something here, and that I need to pay attention to this stream of thought about “being Jeff.”   We’ll see.

Go and do your work today.  Be the “you” you were meant to be, your better self.

Peace…

4 Comments

Filed under Faith and Art, Quotes, Spirituality, Writing