Tag Archives: Jesus

Irreverence, Icons, and The Holy: The Collage Art of Marty Gordon

And Marty said, “Let there be glue…”

And there was glue, applied to icons of the holy, the kitschy, the comic, and the kooky; surreal landscapes featuring damsels and dinosaurs, nudies and nerds, monkeys and moon rockets.

Coffee shops are the perfect place to look at art, right?   Maybe, but Marty Gordon’s current show at Capitol Hill’s Victrola Coffee presents a dilemma for the interested collage-o-phile.  Inevitably, due to their diminutive size and detail (not to mention the color), these collages invite you closer; you want to stick your nose right up against the glass, so to speak.  I mean, who wants to miss the delicious little word bubbles, all these children and vixens and deities and sumo wrestlers chatting up devils, cherubs, and misogynists?  I mean, come on, you want your eye to have time to wander a bit, back and forth between these wildly disparate elements, these densely packed juxtapositions intriguing enough to lead you to wonder if there just might be a 3-D comedic horror movie surreptitiously playing on the other side of the frame.

But it’s hard to get close on a night like last night, when I headed up 15th Ave NE to Victrola for a sandwich, a green tea, and some art viewing.  Food and drink were fine, but looking at the art didn’t really work out, because the place was packed.  It was as if each painting had it’s own little guardian, protecting these precious truth-windows, as if an evil (or at least dastardly) wizard with a great big word bubble might come floating in the door any minute to steal them all!

But who could blame a wizard for wanting these collages hanging in his wizard house?  They’re pretty magical.

Full disclosure: I’m a friend of Mr. Gordon’s, and have been looking at this work for several years, but this is the first time I’ve actually decided to bring a critical eye to what he’s up to, and talk about it.  Not being an art critic per se, I’ll probably miss by a mile, but my purpose is to perhaps expose a few more people to the complexity and delight of this dynamic, definitely-to-be-taken-seriously, artist.  And let it be said that these are just my opening salvos; I may be returning to his work again.  The more I look at it, the more impressive and curious it becomes.

Find Marty’s collages at his website Martworks: The Art of Marty Gordon (What Would Jesus Glue?) .  He also has pieces for sale at his Etsy site.

So here you are, standing in front of a collage by Marty Gordon.  What are you seeing?

You’re always looking at a new world with these collages; it’s as if God were constantly reconsidering how he originally put things together and keeps trying.  It’s good to keep in mind that when you first engage the frame, all bets are off, all usual connections are suspect, and if you’re going to tread metaphorically in these lands do so with a light foot.  Put too much weight on what you think the whole thing means, and you’re liable to fall through the floor.  At the very least, you’ll find yourself stuck back at head scratching.

So, yes, these are 5 x 7, 8 x 10, 10 x10 worlds, and Marty is a god-like hand peopling them with all manner of creatures, technologies, time epochs, sciences, spiritualities, and witticisms.  Each world is built to jar the viewer.  Not as in hit-you-with-a-hammer: it’s more like Doc’s little knee whacker that just won’t quit.   Most of the time, Gordon’s work hits you in a funny bone kind of way, but sometimes it’s closer to the smack on the elbow, the one that leaves your whole arm ringing.

For all you fans of bullet point critique, so you can peruse swiftly, here are a few of the things Marty’s up to, and I’ll bet there’s lots more, but I’m running out of time:

•   He’s drawing lines of tension between what is serious and what’s not, allowing the not-so-serious to call the seriousness of the serious into question.  Pop Culture’s mashup with religion, science, and commercial nuttiness can become ludicrous when you think very hard about it, and Marty leads us into thinking about it. 

•   He’s exposing our false sense of security in the stories we tell ourselves.  

•   He’s using satire and absurdity to lift those questions that lurk beneath the surface of our consciousness into our awareness.  The comedy—and its ambiguity—allows us to confront what often just doesn’t make much sense.  (What does it mean that Jesus loves Hitler?  Was Adam’s inability to find a mate among the animal kingdom really the reason God made woman?)

•   He’s suggesting that we live in a time of confusion, where we have a hard time understanding what best serves and ennobles human culture and civilization.  (The Pope wants the wisdom of the Bhudda, a professional wrestler wants to pretend-fight, and a child wants candy while planes head toward skyscrapers.)

•   One of my favorite themes in Marty’s work is his ability to locate technology and its effects both inside and outside the human.  (Space Stations inside the brain of a man in distress, and two men observing that maybe video game playing is about as serious as they need to get.) 

•   He’s slamming images suggesting sacredness into spaces where they are forced to interact with pop culture kitsch bordering on the profane, raising not only eyebrows, but also the question, “Where the hell do we find the holy, anyway, and who gets to say?”

•   He’s playing with words, conversations, tweets, names, icons, almost as if they are independent of each other, allowing his new created contexts to jar us, alter meanings and perceptions of things we often take for granted. 

•   He’s doing beautiful compositions. His strong sense of balance, line, contrast, unity, color, and rhythm means we almost always like what we see long before we get to what it’s suggesting.

To briefly summarize—and like I said, I may be missing this by a mile—I’d say Mr. Gordon is nimbly, and often, brilliantly, mocking our tepid notions of the sacred, the holy, and the important.  Which, by the way, is very different than saying he is mocking the authentic Sacred, Holy, and Important.   If people get offended by the alleged irreverence of Marty’s work, they need to remember that it’s not Jesus he’s making fun of.   God is not as much on trial in Marty’s work as we are.  (Oh…we do get it, and that’s why we’re offended.)  And by “we” (and this is very cool of Marty), I mean both believer and non-believer.  We need to acknowledge that not only do Jesus-folk not have a corner on the market of knowledge, we’re not cornering the market on craziness, either.

And oddly enough, the alleged inhabitants of Heaven keep showing up in these topsy-turvy worlds, watching (and reminding us that they’re watching) making me wonder if the whole crew up there figures our world and our antics are just about as surreal and strange as the worlds Gordon creates.   To Jesus, maybe the Fall of Humanity in Genesis 3 turned everything into a Marty Gordon collage.   (So now we could label his work “realism”—hah!)

As J.B. Phillips once famously put it, our God is too small.  I think we need to thank Marty Gordon for giving us a pretty cool ongoing visual reminder of just how small we think holiness can be.  For in so doing, he intimates the legitimate power and beauty of the Real Thing.

Leave a Comment

Filed under art, Faith and Art, Pop Culture, Spirituality, Uncategorized

Impressions on a Fat Tuesday

Roy Orbison sings “Pretty Woman” as the man by the window, white earplugs delivering his preferred white noise, ruffles the paper, sets it down, and stands up to leave, almost as if he can feel me observing, writing about him.   A buddy and he walk out the door, into the rain, calling back over their shoulders “Have a nice day.”   Iris cranks out the coffee from the grinder, the clicking cracking the quiet of the coffee shop.   Water falls in straight lines through the light, and cars whoosh by, the street busy with early morning souls hurrying toward wherever early morning souls hurry toward.    I am not content, but I’m close.   4:45 the alarm strummed me awake, and the workout was simple, even easy.   Odd thing though, I didn’t drink anything–not a drop–until after the workout, after the shower, after the kiss goodbye to my wife, after the trip to the coffee shop, after the latte was poured, the thick foam carved into the leaf shape hovering for a brief moment on the top of the cup.   Then I drank.   Thankfully, the coffee was hot enough.

I am not content, but I’m close.

I am frightened.   A little, at least, because of a situation in my family that I’m unsure how to insert myself into, or even if I should.   I am thrilled.  I’m acting again, last night being the first rehearsal of the next play at what I think of as my home theatre.   I am hopeful.   Plans for the next ten years are clarifying, and though I know there are no guarantees, the fact that any shape at all is observable I take as a blessing, an arrival of a guide.   (I say arrival…He’s never gone.)  I am proud.   Both good and bad, this one–so I’ve got children I can barely think of, I love them so much.   Then again, the pride thing is my back being up, being offended, thinking I’m something I’m not, having a hard time saying “sorry”, even though I’ve said it a zillion times in my years.  I am grateful.   I won’t even begin to list.   My thanks likes lists, and I haven’t time for the full boggling of the mind that comes with that sort of inventory.   Begin with material, end with the invisible, sandwich them with cosmos large and small, quantum and Newtonian, and wrap it family and whatever bits of love you can wrap your head around.   I am in love.   I blew a kiss to the girl who has my heart as we drove cars in opposite directions in the pre-dawn rain.   She is light that refuses to be extinguished, much like the Lord we both look to.   I am tempted.   It’s Fat Tuesday after all…what’s a little indulgence like the rest of the world?  Lent comes tomorrow, and it’ll be time to bow the head anew, reflect again on the loss and the sacrifice and the regret.   Confession is good for the soul.  Should I do a thing today I’ll have to confess tomorrow, knowing God will forgive?   As Paul said, “Dumb idea.”   (My translation.)

Here comes the light, here comes the day.  How do you plan worship?  How do you plan to be surprised by the greatness of God so much so that you have to sing about it?   Who knows, but that’s my task today.   And we ministers will pray, and I’ll meet with people over more and more coffee, and I’ll memorize lines, and imagine two guys named Grant and a guy named Lee slugging it out over a long ago war.   I’ll grade a couple of papers if I have time, all of it before doing the table work with a director and the other actors of the play that will be part of my Lenten practice for 2010.   I’ll miss things.   I’ll discover something big, a small thought, like I did yesterday (not ready to say what it is.)  I’ll sleep, or I won’t, and I’ll think of whether I built the day on rock or sand.   Did I judge?  Did I let my yes be yes?   Did I lay up a treasure here, or perhaps in a higher place?   (Is Heaven really “up?”) I’ll hurry, I’ll work hard, I’ll slough off at least one thing, and I’ll torture myself over some bit of incompetence I’ll be sure someone will notice.   I’ll do better and worse than yesterday and tomorrow all at the same time.

Here we go.

I have nothing to say, really, but words arrive anyway, appearing ready for service, and I write them down, trusting that something will emerge.

On Sundays, I forgo Lenten practice because always, the Christ rises on Sunday.   I cannot fast as resurrection happens all over again.   As the tradition holds, feasting trumps fasting on the Son’s day.

Lord Jesus, have mercy on me, a sinner…

1 Comment

Filed under Daily Life, Uncategorized

Meaning of Life 1.6 – Incarnation

For those who might want to catch up with the Meaning of Life posts (they’re spread out over time), here are the links.

———-

The Sinai Pantocrator (6th C.)

The Sinai Pantocrator (6th C.)

INCARNATION

Invisible made visible.  Immaterial finding expression in material.  Idea taking physical, sensual form.

Again…making.

At the start, God makes a universe and a world.   That world bears the marks of His glory, His character, His being.  But it is not Him.  The world’s essence, its beauty, its laws–physical and moral–spring from who He is, but it is not His Being in the flesh. Incarnation is at work in this initial act of creation, undoubtedly.   God’s idea, His dream, His desire, His life…all of these somehow finding expression in His work of those six days, finding culmination in the creature He stamps with His image. Humanity, the most god-like of creation, God’s image setting these beings apart.

But the image gets damaged, all sinned-up, cracked, distorted…yet, the image remains.  The image goes on making, laboring as intended, but now struggling against the entropy, the inertia, the reluctance of the ground, fury building, breaking into fouler incarnation, anger and hate emerging as words and blows meant to maim and kill.   Division rules; every English Lit. class teaches it–man against man, man against nature, man against God, man against himself was the way I first heard it.

The whole world agrees…something is wrong.

Who will deliver us from this body of death? The Apostle Paul

The Romans 7 cry, universally understood…the cry of the race.

Now comes a new making.  A pregnant mother, the common 9 months, the birth into humanity, and the Image of God comes again, but this time, all is intact, unbroken, untainted, the hovering Spirit of God bringing pure creation once more.

Invisible made visible.  Word finding expression in material, namely, flesh.   The Divine One taking physical, sensual form, walking, breathing, growing, learning, healing, changing, repairing, restoring…bringing transformation to the whole enterprise.  The Messia–Yeshua (Jesus to the Greeks)–even takes the brokenness onto himself, allowing the malady to infect him and kill him, suffering humiliation, torture, and finally death in the process.  After the dark of all this, the burial stone rolls back, and now it’s Death that’s cracked and busted, and “living water” pours into the world through the fissures.   This living water, Jesus said, is the Spirit of the Living God, and once again, the connection between “Maker” and “made” comes back online. “Cool of the evening” walks with God are possible again.   Making can take on new joy, new power, new life.

New life.  Metabolism, through which the human being draws life from its very source.

That’s the story.  Stewardship of time, energy, resources, and creativity as we walk through life in the company of God, made possible by His Living Word…is it much different from what Adam and Eve were told?

What if incarnation was the whole point to begin with?  What if incarnation, the move from idea to form which sparks new ideas which lead to new forms–what if this process was the whole point?  Could it be said that the meaning of life is found in incarnation, in creation, in making, especially when the essence being incarnated (made flesh) is God’s?

Again, it points to making–making life, love, moments, hope, newness, disciples, and possibility.  Through the Incarnation of the Christ, life is saved, rescued, put back together.   Could it be that meaning is found in joining just that enterprise, through making lives like His, or better yet, by allowing His life to empower ours, so that He, through us, can continue to save, rescue, and put back together through His Spirit, the same creative Spirit that was there at the beginning?

Sounds meaningful to me.

But there’s a problem…children of God are missing…

Leave a Comment

Filed under art, Spirituality

Letting Go: What I Meant to Say

Letting go is a ruthlessly practical matter.

Actors get bound up by inhibitions, fear, and wasted muscular tension.  Relationships go south because wrongs committed become posts to wrap fists around.   New careers go unborn because persistent, outdated self-perceptions just won’t fade.

At this juncture in my life–one more sermon to preach, a new play rehearsal period beginning tonight, projects stretching in front of me that are as yet undefined–I’m wondering out loud what needs to be released in order for what’s coming to get a fair chance.

Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?

One day, a young man who had probably heard Jesus speak, had perhaps seen a miracle or two, and at the very least had been rocked by the tales of this man from Nazareth, chased the ragged band of transients down and knelt at the feet of the leader.   Catching his breath, he asked, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”  There’s an exchange about just who is good, and a commandment or two, then Mark’s gospel gives us the small detail “Jesus loved him.”  Then Jesus gives him a simple answer to a simple question.  “Go, sell everything you own and give it to the poor, and you will have treasure in Heaven.  Then, come follow me.”  The rich young man, terribly disappointed, turned and leaves, and the Christ explains to his followers it’s just hard to get into the Kingdom of Heaven, especially if you’ve got lots of money.

Yesterday, in my sermon, I framed this story by freezing on the moment in time in which the young man heard Jesus’ answer.  He faced, and made, a decision.  Would he let go of what he had in order to gain the treasure he had found?   Then I proposed that we, both personally and as a church, are this young man, splayed at Jesus’ feet, asking, “How do we find the kind of life that will last?  How do we beat death?  How do we live the way you do?  What does Kingdom living look like, the kind of living that has God and love written all over it?”

I’d hoped to hold “Love” and “Letting go” in tension, implying a relationship between the two, especially as it relates to the felt experience of receiving love.  In the end, the young man missed the fact that the most astonishing love was creating a world in which it was perfectly safe to let go of his former treasure.  He didn’t notice this organic compassion, the move of Jesus’ heart toward him.  Blinded by the threat of having to give up what he knew, what he’d fought for, perhaps the only thing in life that was really his, he missed the experience of love.  By clutching the past, he missed the treasure he was really looking for.  The life of the Christ moved on, and the text gives us no indication of what happened to this young man, but the implication is that he never lived out the answer to his question, never found the life that beats death.

Thinking back over the sermon, I’m not sure I said what I meant to say.   What I meant say was this:  the act of “letting go” is a key to the love of Christ becoming an experience of felt reality. Like actors, we have “blocks,” mental, emotional, and physical states of being that inhibit our ability to receive and respond fully to what’s happening around us.  Mental and muscular tension tie actors up in literal knots, and as we grip our riches, our guilt, our ambitions, our pride, our pasts–whatever, our muscles are tied up, and we are unable to receive the new life of love the Spirit is incessantly pouring into those of us who believe.  For actors, untying those knots is critical.  Release through training and discipline allows creativity, nuance, and full-hearted freedom to inform the acting moments, and until the blocks are dealt with and released, the power of their full imagination and humanity will not come pouring in.

Sounds like the old metaphors…empty the cup to fill it, open the hand to receive, die to live.  The practice of letting go daily sounds a lot like cross-carrying.

If the rich young man had given up his riches, not only would he have found life, he would have experienced, in his heart and bones, the love of God.

What must a church give up to allow the experience to pour through it into the lives of the its surrounding community?

What must I let go of in order to experience that fullness of the love of the Christ that Paul was talking about?

And I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the saints, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, and to know this love that surpasses knowledge—that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God.  Ephesians 3:17-19

Maybe that’s closer to what I meant…

3 Comments

Filed under Spirituality

To See

Two weeks ago, I preached a sermon that was the beginning of a new series at church I’m simply calling “The Jesus Lab: Discovering and Practicing the Artful Action of Jesus.”  I’m borrowing an idea from the world of acting, wondering out loud what Jesus was doing from moment-to-moment, asking the question the way I would ask an actor about a character.  I know what the character is saying, what words he’s using, perhaps even what activity he is involved in.   But rarely do those things answer the question of what the character is doing, what action they are involved in.   For actors, actions are always verbs and represent what the character is doing to chase after that which they want.

What did Jesus want, and what was he doing to get what he wanted?

The thought came to me to ask the question this way several years ago when I was working on a solo performance piece I called “The Jesus Monologues.”  I felt like (and still do) that people just needed to hear his words, what he actually said.  But in preparing those words for performance, I had to ask myself who he was talking to, what he was trying to accomplish, and what he was doing.  What I knew was that as an actor, I could make many different choices with these words, playing multiple actions that most people hadn’t thought of.  Jesus could be in the middle of a healing, but what he might really be doing is scolding or warning.   I was a director who kept asking Jesus, “What are you doing?”

As I thought about verbs, and proceeding along the lines that we should be acting the same verbs as Jesus, the first thing that came to mind was a simple one: to see.

Eastern approaches speak of “waking up” and “awareness.”   We talk about changing perspectives, using new glasses, seeing with new eyes, re-inventing the way we understand ourselves and those around us, both friend and stranger.  Obviously, our soul-sight is far from 20-20, while the assumption is that Jesus saw even the smallest lines on the chart.  On that Sunday two weeks ago, we talked about the power of the Imago Dei, that Jesus would have understand that these people were all image-carriers of God, the divine thumb-print embedded in the most foul and the most perfect alike.   And knowing that he entrusted himself perfectly to his father, he was free to see the other as they were, broken, unique, utterly savable, utterly worth the self-sacrifice needed to make it happen.

If an actor chose to use that verb for his action, I’m not sure I’d buy it.  I’d wonder how to play it, as we like to say.   And then we’d wonder about the verbs that lead to seeing.  What actions will create the energy that an outside observer would call “seeing?”

To gaze, to meditate, to reach out, to ask, to engage, to pursue, to seek out, to stare, to focus, to…what?

Thoughts?

One thing I ask, one thing I seek, to see Your beauty…

4 Comments

Filed under art, Faith and Art, Spirituality